.

Cos Cob Neighborhood Unites Against Synagogue's Development Plan

Cos Cob Families Fighting for Residential Rights held its first meeting Tuesday night to discuss how they will prevent Greenwich Reform Synagogue from building new facilities in their residential neighborhood.

 

Cos Cob residents against the Greenwich Reform Synagogue’s (GRS) plans to buy three parcels of land in the neighborhood to build a synagogue, classroom space and other amenities, met at Cos Cob Volunteer Fire Company Tuesday evening to learn more about the process that the organization will go through to get approval from the Planning & Zoning Board and discuss ways to protect the quality of their tight-knit neighborhood.

Republican State Sen. L. Scott Frantz (R-36th), State Rep. Fred Camillo (R-151st) and Selectman Drew Marzullo joined a full house at the meeting, which was organized by Cos Cob Families Fighting for Residential Rights, to show to their support.

Frantz told attendees that he only learned about the synagogue's plans Tuesday afternoon, but was confident that if residents worked together, they could preserve their beloved neighborhood.

"It's standing room only [in here], which shows that you care about your neighbors and that's a great thing," he said. "You are a tight-knit residential community that goes back generations...so there's lot worth fighting for and I believe that Planning & Zoning will be on your side."

Frantz advised residents to stay focused and organized, speak in a single voice and be prepared to fight for the next 18-24 months as GRS attempts to get its site plan approved. "Make sure you stay on it and hire the best lawyer," he said.

After group member John Timm outlined the steps GRS will take to get approval—starting with a request for a lot change at the next P&Z meeting on Nov. 27—residents began to explore the various actions the group could take next, including hiring a lawyer and possibly purchasing the land from GRS.

Camillo, who grew up in Cos Cob, likened the situation to his fight to keep cell phone towers out of residential neighborhoods. "We had a multi-pronged approach to it and we started early...We went [for] aesthetics, historical districts, fall zones—anything that we could fight with by law. We had to do our due diligence," he said.

_________________________________________________________________________________________

Have you joined Greenwich Patch? Stay on Greenwich Patch for the latest news and information from town officials. Follow us on Twitter and Facebook, too.

_________________________________________________________________________________________


In addition to encouraging residents to sign a petition and attend the next P&Z meeting, members of Cos Cob Families Fighting for Residential Rights have been in contact with lawyers based both in Greenwich and in surrounding towns to discuss their options for preventing GRS from building their synagogue.

Committee member Sarah Darer Littman told attendees that most Greenwich-based lawyers are refusing to take the case because of "conflict of interest." Littman said she found it strange that the lawyer that represented her four years ago when former Greenwich Tax Collector Lou Caravalla previously tried to build three homes on her land is now representing GRS. She added that she is now in contact with a lawyer that is based in a nearby town, but has experience handling cases in Greenwich.

While most attendees were looking for any possible way to break the contract that will eventually allow GRS to purchase land at 22 Osee Place and 96 Orchard Street, a few felt that there was no concrete way to stop the organization from executing its plan and that the only option left would be for the residents to purchase the land themselves.

Marzullo, who currently resides on Orchard Street, said that the best approach—in addition to hiring a lawyer—would be to start a flow of communication between the residents and the synagogue's president and legal representative. "You have to bring it to them in dialogue and not necessarily two months from now," he said.

Marzullo added that he spoke with the GRS president prior to the meeting the fact that some residents feel the opposition towards the plan is based on anti-Semitic views. "The idea that this has anything to do with anti-Semitism is sickening to me and the president thinks that it has nothing to do with that whatsoever, so just be cognizant of that," he said.

RTM District 8 Member Christopher von Keyserling strongly encouraged residents to fight the plan instead of purchasing the land or letting the chips fall where they may.

"If you want to win, you have look at how the people who win do it," he said. "...I've been through hundreds of these cases... I can't tell you truthfully what's going to come out with it, it's either going to be a very fast solution or it's going to be a long, drawn out [fight] over a number of years...but this is a for-the-throat game and you're in a tough, tough fight against people who don't give a flying damn."

After the meeting, committee coordinator Tina Walsh told Patch that she felt the goal of the first meeting was accomplished. "It's not about my individual concern, it's not about anybody else's individual concern, it's when you put them all together and put them in a context of a neighborhood, that's what's really important," she said. "When it's all of the different concerns put together, it makes for a compelling case."

Lana Ross November 27, 2012 at 10:10 PM
Tia it is not zoned commercial. It is R12 residential zoning.
Hilda Lee December 01, 2012 at 03:57 PM
The GRS stated that a reason for choosing 92 Orchard Street to build their new home is that a school and a church are already in the area; one more institution will not alter the nature of that part of Cos Cob or create extra inconvenience to the neighborhood. Their view is misleading. Misleading: 1) Both CMS and the Baptist Church came into existence on public demand and were configured with the community at the time in the 1960s. The church was built in 1960 along with many family homes in the neighborhood. The school arrived in 1964 due to the need to educate local children. Today's residents, both long-standing and recent, fully understand and respect this history and existing living environment. They do not desire, and have the right to reject, another big institution built on their doorstep. 2) Both CMS and the church are on Indian Rock Lane which is serviced by a number of roads. The proposed Synagogue will have only one entry point -- on 92 Orchard Street, which is fully surrounded by family houses with children. 3) Both CMS and the church are situated at the end of a residential zone bordering a big open space on generous-sized lots. The proposed institution would be in the middle of family houses on too small a lot. It could only blend into the current neighborhood if the bulk of its 20,000 sq. ft structure and 100 car-parking facility are built underground, with a tunnel connecting to the Post Road. From very-concern
Hilda Lee December 01, 2012 at 03:59 PM
The manner in which the GRS handled the proposed lot-line realignment has so far been less than honorable: their lawyer insisted in front of the P & Z hearing that "they are two single family lots now and they will remain two family lots after the lot-line is changed." In truth, that was only the first of many applications that will lead to a change of use of the combined property; the "intent" behind the action is to ridicule the P&Z process with the "whole world" watching.
Concerned Citizen December 04, 2012 at 06:56 PM
Thanks for the info. I will sign up at www.greenwichneedsyou.com to join in opposition. I am a pedestrian who uses the Orchard Street entrance to the wildwife preserve/Pinetum, which is located about 5 houses north of the proposed development site at 92-96 Orchard. There is a pedestrian crosswalk I use to cross Orchard Street, and I already take my life in my hands every time I want to use the park. Traffic making left turns into the 92-96 Orchard property will back up the already congested Orchard Street, which is only one lane in either direction, and there is no room to build a left turn lane. I would hope that the GRS takes the neighborhood concerns into account and rethinks their purchase of this land. They had 11.5 acres up sparsely populated Stanwich Road, and they now potentially have two acres in a densely populated, highly trafficked neighborhood. This section of Orchard Street will become car-crash central, unfortunately for all involved.
Sandra Mannaravalappil December 13, 2013 at 11:27 AM
My family lived at 98 & 100 Orchard Street for many years, my aunt just sold her house on at 98 a few years ago. This is a mistake Orchard street cannot handle the traffic it has , the Caravella Family of all people know this. Louie was once called the Unofficial Mayor of Cos Cob and now he has thrown it to the wolves how sad

Boards

More »
Got a question? Something on your mind? Talk to your community, directly.
Note Article
Just a short thought to get the word out quickly about anything in your neighborhood.
Share something with your neighbors.What's on your mind?What's on your mind?Make an announcement, speak your mind, or sell somethingPost something
See more »