.

What's Joseph Kony Have to Do with Us, Here?

Thanks to a viral online campaign, 75 million people learned about the African warlord last week. What this means about who we are and how YOU can now change the world.

What does a rebel warlord in Uganda and central Africa have to do with you here in metro New York?

Once you watch the video to the right, your may have a completely different answer to that question.

And when you answer it at the end of this column, you'll find that the power to change the world may rest with you—simply at the touch of a button.

Perhaps you’ve heard about the “Kony 2012” campaign. Most likely some of your Facebook friends linked to a video about Joseph Kony, the leader of the Lord’s Resistance Army and the world’s biggest criminal, who’s being sought for capture and prosecution by the International Criminal Court. It’s possible you read about the video in news reports or saw it discussed on TV talk shows over the last week.

“Kony 2012” is a modern kind of campaign designed to harness the power of viral marketing and social media networks. The campaign’s architects want to shine a light of global awareness to make Kony ‘famous’—in an effort to have him located and captured.

The non-profit group that launched the campaign, Invisible Children, has worked since 2003 to raise awareness with individuals and government officials alike about the atrocities Kony and his army have committed. Some of their efforts resulted in about 100 U.S. troops deployed to central Africa to advise local forces in the hunt for Kony.

Because of this, Invisible Children now feels they’ve generated enough heat that Kony is on the run and the clock is ticking to get him stopped. So they’re turning up the volume even higher.

Last week they released the 30-minute video in hopes it would go viral to get as many millions of people talking about Kony as possible—and it seems they’ve succeeded. 

In just a week, they got more than 74 million hits to their YouTube video, “Kony 2012” and personalities like Justin Bieber, U2’s Bono, Angelina Jolie and Oprah Winfrey have taken up the cause on Twitter, helping the site to generate millions of tweets in the last week alone, with hashtags like #LRAviolence and #KONY.

As someone in the film says, “We are living in a Facebook world, a new world where 750 million people share ideas, not thinking in borders.”

What a futuristic—and brilliant—concept. Using techniques similar to product marketing and celebrity publicity, you can change the global conversation and get people to act. Not to buy Coke, or to watch the Super Bowl—but can you get them to do something humanitarian on a global level?

The word ‘global’ is critical because Invisible Children is trying to get you and me to feel that just by clicking a “share” button we individually can make an impact on the other side of the world and they’re counting on everyone around the world to feel the same way.

For sure this is a story that makes people want to get involved. For the last couple of decades, Kony and his henchmen have been kidnapping young children, forcing the boys to become child soldiers in his army against their will and turning the young girls into sex slaves. The children are made to do atrocious things—the young boys mutilate and kill others, even their own parents. How many children has he done this to? More than 30,000, according to Invisible Children.

The compelling footage has grabbed the attention of people who ordinarily wouldn’t tune in to this kind of story. As someone in the movie says, they want “to prove that a bunch of littles could make a difference.”

People I never would have thought would be so tuned in to world events—or step forward as ‘activists’—have taken up the cause. Here in the United States, where the partisan rift is almost insurmountable, my friends on both the far right and far left shared the link to the Kony video, pleading with everyone they knew by saying, “You MUST watch this.”

During the Winter Carnival at my daughter’s elementary school just this past weekend, I had conversations with four different people about Kony. “Did you watch the video? You have to watch!” is what I was told. The chorus is definitely getting louder.

In this age, getting anyone, especially the Y generation, to commit themselves to watching something for 30 minutes is like asking Sarah Palin to endorse President Obama in 2012—it’s highly unlikely to happen.

But this is a generation that increasingly has focused its humanitarian and issue-driven efforts in a viral way: Look at when viral protests convinced dozens of advertisers to drop ads on his show after his recent misogynistic comments. Similarly, the for showed the success a viral campaign can have in this arena.

With Kony, the effort aimed at getting international government leaders to make this a global priority springs from a grassroots level. The campaign is not without controversy, as critics have found fault with some of the motives and approach the founders have taken.

All the same, the effort can still speak volumes about what kind of world we want to have and the tools that are now at our disposal to make it happen.

Imagine if this type of instantly spreadable communication had existed in 1940, and someone had made a video saying, “Stop Hitler.” With such graphic images of concentration camps and trains chugging to their horrific destinations, perhaps it could have made a difference in the lives of millions, including those of my ancestors.

The power of the “share” button is now so great, it is larger than simply getting laughs out of watching kittens that play the piano and what we do with it on an individual level defines us on the global one.

The thing many people said in sharing the Kony video was “You have to pay attention.” That is the glimmer of hope broadcasted and shared into a crescendo of possibility and a view on what this kind of sharing can do—getting those who usually don’t pay attention to tune in and make change.

Now that you’ve read this, what will you do? Will you share it and pass it on? The world is listening—and waiting.

Paul Michalski March 15, 2012 at 11:34 AM
Your sleight-of-hand comparison of the Kony video to the attack on Komen is an insult to Invisible Children. The Kony video is a humanitarian attempt to bring a murderer to justice. The attack on Komen was the use of traditional and social media by the murderers to silence an opponent and force them to continue to fund murder--orchestrated blackmail at the expense of breast cancer victims to further a political agenda of death under the rubric of women's rights. The appropriate comparison would be Kony using a viral campaign to silence Invisible Children by accusing them of racism. In a brilliant keynote speech at the National Prayer Breakfast in Washington earlier this year, author Eric Metaxas described the inhumane treatment of Africans during the slave trade and Jews in Nazi Germany--they were people groups viewed by society as not fully human. He then compared the people group whom we as a society today treat inhumanely because we view them as not fully human--the unborn. We are no better than British Society during the days of William Wilberforce or German society during the days of Dietrich Bonhoeffer. For another perspective on the the Komen attacks, read the recent WSJ article by Robert George of Princeton University at http://online.wsj.com/article/SB10001424052970204369404577206692451108960.html P.S. Did you know that Planned Parenthood will not show an ultrasound to a young mother so that she will not see "life" and be dissuaded from buying death?
sebastian dangerfield March 15, 2012 at 03:30 PM
Paul Im no psychologist, but your assertion that an ultrasound is a sales technique is disturbing. Buying death? 1) I looked at an ultrasound of my future grandchild, and I cant make out , where they tell me the baby is. 2) if someone walked into planned parenthood, they most likely have made their decision, and showing them the 'life' simply adds anguish to their decision. You use the term ' young mother'-- as if it portray the pregnant woman as a naive victim and that the 'objective' of planned parenthood is to kill babies. I find that totally revolting on many levels. If you want to more accurately portray these women who enter those facilities, they are middle aged, extremely poor women, who I cannot presume to understand their circumstances that lead them into those facilities. I see an entire host of pragmatic reasons for not endeavoring to show an ultrasound to a pregnant woman who intends to end the pregnancy. But your description of buying death is offensive and judgmental.
Paul Michalski March 15, 2012 at 08:31 PM
Luca, I am judgmental about murder--without apology--it is wrong. And I agree with you--what Planned Parenthood does is offensive. I understand your sentiments, because it is hard to believe, but I urge you to look at the facts. 75% of abortions in America involve mothers in their teens and twenties. 18% of abortions involve mothers are under the age of 20. Read the account of Abby Johnson, who was a Planned Parenthood employee for 8 years until she witnessed an abortion on ultrasound--the baby fighting to get away from the doctors tool. http://www.abbyjohnson.org/ She explains that Planned Parenthood is run like a business, with clinics having quotas of abortions they are meant to meet because the abortions fund other services--they are the profit center. They vigorously oppose laws that would require ultrasounds or require mothers to hear the heartbeat or see a picture--anything that would bring the numbers down. I have a good friend who runs a pregnancy center in Manhattan--I have heard the stories of women who have come in and shared their Planned Parenthood experiences. All of your adjectives apply--disturbing, offensive--and many more.
sebastian dangerfield March 16, 2012 at 12:33 AM
Paul. You say "And I agree with you--what Planned Parenthood does is offensive." is that what you thought I meant? Or are you being clever in your response , yet dishonest in articulating what you believe I said? Jesus says he is The Truth. Paul, if you stray from the truth, you walk away from Jesus. Is that ok with you? "The baby FIGHTING to get away from the doctors tool." Really? You believe the baby was fighting with the doctor? then perhaps the doctor did this in self-defense? (See Paul, while you may think this line of word-play is clever, it serves little than to bring the discussion to a dishonest and therefore unproductive level.) If you want to ridicule and argue using 'clever semantics" that serve little purpose other than to go into some realm of nonsense--you succeed. But if the Pro-Life movement is supported only by an ability to twist words, and distort facts, you may want to reconsider your stance. The Far right both condemns Welfare/ handouts and the ability for women to make responsible choices (after admittedly irresponsible choices were made) . I dont view early abortion as murder....yet I wont deny your view on the matter. I do believe your interpretation of abortion as being murder is melodramtic and designed, like the rest of your statement to demonstrate an attitude that deviates from rational thought. The death penalty, abortion are determined by our laws as being legal--and therefore, something different than murder.
sebastian dangerfield March 16, 2012 at 03:48 AM
If you want to debate or discuss when life begins--im completely open to listening and understanding peoples beliefs on this issue. But the angry and accusatory and inflammatory "murderer" hyperbole, serves only to inflame the topic, and prevents any rational approach to a solution or an advance towards a solution. The evangelicals feel self-righteous and love to sermonize on what RIGHT AND WRONG is....the problem , however, is that they do not respect the opposite side enough (not what Jesus preached.) They resort to lies (un-jesus-like) they murder abortion doctors in the name of their sanctity of life (un jesus-like). Young poor women who make choices that may be extremely difficult, yet lawful should not be called murderers or buyers of death. All of that angry vitriolic hyperbole is not Christian. Even if you believe that the cause is Righteous--you should conduct yourself in a way that is more respectful and Christian way. Counsel. Preach. Educate. Dont point fingers and call people murderers to raise the temperature of this debate. You cross the line that you understand to be proper.
Paul Michalski March 16, 2012 at 04:57 AM
Read Abby Johnson's account of the ultrasound that led her to leave Planned Parenthood and decide for yourself. The fact that something is "legal" does not make it right. Slavery was not right even though it was legal. Murdering Jews was not right even though it was legal. Killing children in the womb is not right even though it is legal. I do not need to respect the view of slave traders that other people are their property. I do not need to respect the view of Hitler that Jews should be exterminated. I do not need to respect the view of those who perform abortions that the death of a fetus is justified or that the fetus is not a person. I am not judging the people, I am condemning the actions as wrong. "Of course, I thought. The fetus doesn’t feel pain. I had reassured countless women of this as I’d been taught by Planned Parenthood. The fetal tissue feels nothing as it is removed. Get a grip, Abby. . .The next movement was the sudden jerk of a tiny foot as the baby started kicking, as if it were trying to move away from the probing invader. As the cannula pressed its side, the baby began struggling to turn and twist away. It seemed clear to me that it could feel the cannula, and it did not like what it was feeling. . .The cannula was already being rotated by the doctor, and now I could see the tiny body violently twisting with it. . . . The last thing I saw was the tiny, perfectly formed backbone sucked into the tube, and then it was gone. "
sebastian dangerfield March 16, 2012 at 07:55 PM
Paul I share your views that if it is legal, it doesnt mean its right. I didnt say it is right. May I ask you again, did you misunderstand that I thought what Planned Parenthood does is offensive? Or were you twisting my words , dishonestly , in a (less than) clever way? You see --when people get to a place of judging others, because they feel moral superiority, and yet, act dishonestly on the path to that place, I shake my head. Lets then play your silly game--and I will say that if the fetus was fighting the doctor, as you bizarrely claim , then the doctor may have acted in self defense. Perhaps you do not understand that when you raise the temperature of issues like this, you do your cause an injustice, Extremism may appeal to you--and you may find it effective in your prayer circles to claim how extreme you have become-- , but I think you will find a far greater level of achievement, if you simply attempt to redefine the stage at which people find it acceptable to perform an abortion. Right now, the left has effectively cast pro-life people as nut job extremists-- who are willing to kill doctors paradoxically , in the name of saving human life. Why not remind people that abortion at the 8th month is unethical-and illegal. So too is it at the 7th month and 6th. Why not push for 2 month or 1 month or earlier? You need to reframe the discussion and characterizing the act as murder only serves to silence you.
sebastian dangerfield March 16, 2012 at 08:04 PM
When you make a statement like this on Patch or anywhere else, I think its important to either defend and support your contentions, or retract them. I reminded you that when you stray from the truth , you distance yourself from Jesus. You have decided to maintain your dishonest approach to answering my posts-and therefore, you have created distance between yourself and the Lord. I think you should do yourself a favor and admit your sins of lying , and move forward, Paul. Otherwise, I think your path of righteousness is littered with conflicts and makes you a hypocrite. Where are you on Syria? There is actual murder going on in Syria. Should the US seek to address these murders? Or is murder only an issue to you, when it occurs to the unborn? For me--I think that people need to live their lives in as honest and pure a way as possible. Holy rollers seek out opportunity to feel morally superior --yet seem disinterested in those causes that are not part of theiir platform. Abortion exists in many cultures--many countries--many states. I wonder out loud, why the evangelicals feel they need to demonstrate so loudly that they are protectors of the innocent--yet turn theiir backs on the murder of many innocents. my point here is---tone down the rhetoric... dont call people murderers even if its in your circle's vernacular--its wrong. And as you say , Paul---you should pursue what is right-- so do the right thing, be honest- and less judgmental.
sebastian dangerfield March 19, 2012 at 06:13 AM
Thanks very much ! For proving my point. People who claim to be morally superior, yet cant even engage in honest debate. Need to twist and mangle the truth--in the name of 'goodness.' Religion is a joke anymore--because the people invested in it-are not into the real meaning. They are into the facade and the image. Where even acknowledging a less than honest approach is too heavy a burden. Yet they seek to influence and control the conversation?? How can you ever influence, when your message is muddled in such a way , that people roll their eyes? Oh , well..... Sadly, Im right about nearly everyone....
Shredder March 19, 2012 at 10:11 PM
Eric Metaxas is a moron. Just because Nazis "didn't view Jews as fully human" doesn't mean that viewing something as not fully human makes you a Nazi/slavetrader. The fact that you've bought into such miserable logic makes me question your level of humanness.
Shredder March 19, 2012 at 10:15 PM
Murder, by definition, is wrong. A medical doctor performing an abortion, is by definition, not murder. Your argument, again, makes no sense. Also, you linking to Abby Johnson is laughable. Would you like me to link you a few accounts of ghost stories?

Boards

More »
Got a question? Something on your mind? Talk to your community, directly.
Note Article
Just a short thought to get the word out quickly about anything in your neighborhood.
Share something with your neighbors.What's on your mind?What's on your mind?Make an announcement, speak your mind, or sell somethingPost something
See more »