Prosecutor: Jennings' Charges Dropped Because Cabbie Withheld Knife

Prosecutor Steven Weiss said that for months the New York cab driver who was cut in a fight with William Bryan Jennings of Darien didn't tell police he had the knife, so Weiss dropped the charges.

Updated throughout until 12:59 p.m.:

A judge in state Superior Court in Stamford dismissed all charges against William Bryan Jennings of Darien after the prosecutor said he would not continue the case because the alleged victim had withheld evidence—the pen knife that cut his fingers.

Assistant State's Attorney Steven Weiss told Judge Kenneth B. Povodator that Mohammed Ammar, the Brooklyn taxi driver who drove Jennings from Manhattan to Darien late last December, had not turned over the knife to police, even though it was a significant piece of evidence.

Jennings, 47, of Knollwood Drive and a prominent banker with Morgan Stanley, had been in a violent dispute with Ammar over the fare. During that fight in the taxi, the cabbie was cut with Jennings' pen knife.

Weiss gave no explanation of why he waited five months—from the middle of May to the middle of October—to decide to drop the case. Ammar's attorney has said that as late as Oct. 5, Weiss had said he was prepared to start the trial on Oct. 15.

Weiss said that when Darien police first came to him with the case, he had decided to prosecute Jennings alone and not Ammar as well, even though Ammar could be charged with unlawful restraint for abducting Jennings for keeping him in the taxi cab against Jennings' will during a wild, late-night ride through Darien.

"In statements to police, [he] admitted committing unlawful restraint," Weiss said.

The prosecutor said he had made that decision because Ammar had gone to police as the physically injured victim, and Jennings had not gone to police for weeks.

"His [Jennings'] explanation as to why he didn't call police simply didn't wash, and I think that was the right decision [to prosecute] at the time," Weiss said.

With Ammar not giving police the knife until May, Weiss said, he realized he had two people who had each impeded a police investigation.

Six days or so after the night of the incident, which was also the night Ammar initially had reported the matter to police, Darien police visited Ammar in New York City and gathered evidence from the taxi cab, Weiss said.

"Since then, it was discovered that Ammar had the knife the whole time," Weiss said. "He had ample opportunity to tell that to police. [...] He didn't tell anybody he had the knife in his possession [until] the middle of May."

Weiss said he then could be fair and prosecute both or be fair and prosecute neither, and he chose the second option.

"I have two people where there's probable evidence they didn't cooperate with police," the prosecutor said. "We could have two trials or I can say I've got two cases where I've got victims that didn't cooperate with police.

"At this point, I don't think there's any public interest involved in having Mr. Ammar arrested, and I don't think there's any public interest in pressing the case with Mr. Jennings. [...] I simply can't go forward."

Jennings' lawyer, Eugene Riccio, then asked Judge Povodator to dismiss the charges entirely, and the judge did so, saying he had no choice.

After the court hearing, which lasted about 10 minutes, Riccio and Jennings both briefly spoke to reporters, but said very little.

Riccio and Jennings spoke once to reporters inside the courthouse and then again outside, mostly for television reporters. Each said they would have very little comment about the case, and each made very brief statements.

"We appreciate the prosecutor's decision—I think it was the right one under the circumstances, Riccio said.

"I think there's a lesson here," he added. "I think it's unfortunate when someone of prominence is arrested that the public, the press jump to conclusions about a situation, and perhaps the next time that occurs, judgment will be withheld until all of the facts are known."

Jennings had been with second-degree assault, sixth-degree larceny and intimidation by bias or bigotry. The larceny charge came from the cab fare dispute, the assault charge from the physical tussle, in which the cabbie said Jennings had reached out with the knife and the cabbie had kept it away with his hands, which then became cut (Jennings said the cabbie had grabbed the knife by the blade).

The intimidation by bias or bigotry charge came because the cab driver, a native of Egypt and now a citizen of the United States, said Jennings had told him he should go back to his own country. Jennings told police he never said that. On the basis of that disputed statement, many news accounts of the case said Jennings was charged with a "hate crime."

Jennings was just about as closed-mouthed:

"The outcome of the case, I think, speaks for itself," he said. He also said he wanted to thank "a very long list of friends and family" who supported him through his ordeal. Jennings said he was also very grateful for Riccio's services as a lawyer and a friend.

Jennings had no comment on whether he was or would be back at his job. Jennings reportedly had been suspended him from his job as a high-ranking banker with Morgan Stanley He was one of two heads of the company's North American fixed-income capital markets division.

Neither Ammar nor his lawyer, Hassan Ahmad of New York, were present at the courthouse, although on Friday Ahmad's law firm had announced he would be at the hearing.

Instead, Ammar and Ahmad decided over the weekend to hold a news conference at Ammar's mosque in Queens. The news conference takes place at 1:30 p.m. in the Astoria section of Queens.

Editor's note: See also Darien Patch's past coverage of the case:

  • Darien Exec Charged with Assaulting Cabbie (March 3)
  • Jennings Pleads Not Guilty (March 9)
  • Jennings Case: No Charges for Cabbie (March 10)
  • Jennings' Lawyer: Police Made False Statements (March 30)
  • Charges Dropped Against Jennings in Taxi Case (Oct. 12)
  • Attorney: Explanations Monday for Dropping Jennings Charges (Oct. 13)
Rich October 15, 2012 at 06:06 PM
David Gurliacci (Editor) October 15, 2012 at 06:17 PM
"I think there's a lesson here," he added. "I think it's unfortunate when someone of prominence is arrested that the public, the press jump to conclusions about a situation, and perhaps the next time that occurs, judgment will be withheld until all of the facts are known." Worth repeating. Worth remembering.
R Rossetti October 15, 2012 at 09:54 PM
100% Agree. A lot of the mean spirited comments stem from jealousy, insecurity and just plain ignorance. As the saying goes, don't judge me until you have walked in my shoes.
OJ October 15, 2012 at 10:13 PM
Time for the Feds t step in and correct this huge injustice. Lets all hope it happens. Liberty and JUSTICE for ALL !
sebastian dangerfield October 15, 2012 at 11:21 PM
Oj Are you speaking of prosecuting the cabbie for impeding a police investigation? Is that what you want the Feds to correct? The 'unlawful restraint' that for a year now, you have termed not true, but now the prosecutor has an admission of? That crime? I dont agree. I think the best thing was to dismiss the case. Obviously neither of these men were totally forthright. Jennings should pay the man for his medical bills...and that should be the end of it. As R Rosetti says, your constant commentary throughout this ordeal , has reflected an unAmerican attitude.
OJ October 16, 2012 at 12:23 AM
No dummy, I'm talking about refusing to pay the fare, stabbing the driver, and fleeing to Florida. Why do you think the perp never returned to his Wall Street job? That's when Jennings allegedly began screaming, “Go back to your own ¬f--king country . . . I’m going to kill you, motherf---er!” before pulling out a penknife and stabbing him. He then allegedly fled the cab on foot. Jennings was busted on charges of assault, theft of service, and intimidation based on race or bigotry weeks after the incident, when he came forward to cops and revealed himself as the man who had run away from Ammar's cab.
Tom Wilson October 16, 2012 at 01:24 AM
All we know for sure is that there were two idiots in that cab.
sebastian dangerfield October 16, 2012 at 02:04 AM
oh Ok Oj Thanks ---i was confused who you were upset about not being prosecuted.
Don Lackritz October 19, 2012 at 07:15 AM
Just another example of how arrogant and bigoted these white collar Republicans are nothing more than unethical and criminally aggressive hypocrites. The "thief" had no grounds to stand on when he (1) greedily wanted to get out of paying the $200+ fare, (2) threatened to kill the driver in order to keep the money he could easily afford and owed for the service, (3) attacked the defenseless driver with a weapon, (4) used racial epithets to boost his criminality up to a racially biased hate crime, (5) ran off, leaving the scene of a crime, and (6) knowing his culpability, hid for some time from explaining his actions to the police since he knew he was the guilty party. I don't know what the man thought the cabbie was doing wrong to incite him to such egregious behavior towards someone lower on his personal "caste system" of social stratification, but his flight seems to bolster his guilty accountability for the incident though he never came forth to explain himself so he had time to invent a story (which doesn't really prove anything, but does indicate a guilty conscience). Had the attack been reversed and the cabbie pulled a knife, there's no doubt he would have been charged, prosecuted, found guilty, and spent years in jail, even if no theft of racial hate were part of the crime. I'm ashamed how my "peer" can both initiate this injustice and defend his bigotry and thievery upon anyone, regardless of their race, color, nationality or creed. He deserves jail time for this.
Rich October 19, 2012 at 11:21 AM
Don, I think the truth lies somewhere in the middle here. Love how you bring politics into this. What a hack...
Rich October 19, 2012 at 11:22 AM
Totally agee neighbor.
David Gurliacci (Editor) October 19, 2012 at 07:07 PM
Don, you're accepting everything the cabbie said was true and nothing that Jennings said was true, because all but #5 is something that Jennings disagreed with from the start. The prosecutor said he had to weigh these conflicting statements and opted to believe the cabbie and prosecute Jennings. Then the prosecutor took back that decision last week, saying that he decided the cabbie couldn't be relied on. This article, and the state of this case, centers around whether or not the cabbie could be believed by a jury. If what the cabbie did with the knife doesn't affect his reliability as a witness, then there's some basis to your comment. If the cabbie is unreliable, then there's no evidence for your comment. So, why do you think the cabbie is reliable?
sebastian dangerfield October 19, 2012 at 10:43 PM
Don, You say"Had the attack been reversed and the cabbie pulled a knife, there's no doubt he would have been charged, prosecuted, found guilty, and spent years in jail, even if no theft of racial hate were part of the crime. I'm ashamed how my "peer" can both initiate this injustice and defend his bigotry and thievery upon anyone, regardless of their race, color, nationality or creed. ' But on what basis, other than his race, are you declaring guilt? Why do you mention if the races of the participants were reversed, everything would have changed? Sounds to me, that it's you that has the racial bias. You rely totally on the statement by the cab driver. Why? If anyone relied on just one of the participants statements, and it was the white guy they believed, you'd call that bigotry. Don, it doesnt change your bigotry when you only listen to one guy, and he happens to be not white. Get it? There was an initial decision, based on Jennings actions, to believe the cabbie--but that all changed when they both were proven to be unreliable.
David Gurliacci (Editor) October 20, 2012 at 01:58 PM
Keep it up with these attacks made by throwaway user accounts and I'll have your IP address blocked. Capisce?
Concerned Citizen October 26, 2012 at 08:32 PM
Why are we still talking about this? This is has been debated, decided and dismissed. This cab driver proved unreliable and lacked credibility -- yet, many seem to want to continue to prosecute Jennings as the bad guy. That is just as racist and bigoted as any other kind of bias. This case is over. Why can't we all just move on? Worthwhile questions everyone should have asked but have not... 1. How did the cabbie end up with the knife in his possesion in the first place if Jennings' version (that he grabbed it from Jennings) isn't true? It's not credible to believe that Jennings purposefully folded it up and left it there for the cops to find. That's far too stupid for anyone to do and not believable. 2. What took the DA so long to decide to toss this case since he knew back in mid May that the cabbie had been hiding the knife? I wonder if the DA had been hiding that information from Jennings and his attorney in an attempt to get them to take a deal before the DA became obligated to disclose this key development to them. 3. Now that the DA has admitted that the cabbie should have been charged with "unlawful restraint", any action Jennings took (no matter who you believe) was within his rights. He was entitled to self defense, was he not? Anybody have the answers to these questions?
Concerned Citizen October 27, 2012 at 02:56 PM
Crickets... thought so.
Tall Tale December 06, 2012 at 01:26 AM
Surprised the DA couldn't come up a solution for the dilemma of the knife. It got lost under the seat! What is so hard about saying that? Or why not just release the evidence? And not in engage in antics against the public. Think a case like this becomes a good opportunity to clean house.
Tall Tale December 06, 2012 at 05:05 AM
So... Turns out the knife did get lost under the seat. Even though the DPD claims they searched the cab. Turns out it was right out in the open too. "Ammar's attorney says his client didn't conceal the knife, he just didn't know he had it until weeks later when he noticed something in his cab. "He didn't know what it was; he didn't know whose it was. He picked it up and he realized at that point he's holding the knife that may have been the knife that was used," said Hassan Ahmad, Ammar's attorney."
Concerned Citizen December 06, 2012 at 12:35 PM
The knife was not lost under the seat. The cops themselves say that. They thoroughly searched the cab on the night of the incident and did not find it. If it was under the seat, they would have found it. Ammar had that knife in his pocket before the cops ever got to him that night. Second, given the divider (floor to ceiling) in the taxi between the front and back seats, there is no way Jennings could have managed to get the knife under the front seat. The only way for it to have ever been there is if Ammar put it there. But we know he didn't put it there since the cops would have found it. Third, the Weiss himself said that Ammar was afraid to come forward with the knife because Ammar's fingerprints were all over the knife (including on the blade). The reason Ammar did not come forward with the knife is because it confirmed Jennings' account of the incident. Ammar did get the knife from Jennings. Ammar did not get stabbed even one time by Jennings. Ammar's fingerprints were on the knife. If this doesn't completely discredit Ammar's original statements and prove Jennings version as believable, then I don't know what would. That taxi driver lied about every aspect of this case and Jennings is the one that has paid a brutal price (in the press, in the community and in his career) just because he got into the wrong cab that night. The cops have culpability here. Jennings has an incredible case against the dopes at the DPD.
max December 06, 2012 at 01:05 PM
And he seems like just the type of guy to persue litigation.
Concerned Citizen December 06, 2012 at 01:22 PM
Why would you say that? Do you know him? And, it's spelled "pursue". Jennings got kidnapped from his own driveway (cops readily acknowledge that fact and driver admits it as well and DA also acknowledged it at Jennings' dismissal hearing) and defended himself, which he had every right to do. And then the world crucified him because he's white and successful. Frankly, it's a disappointing and disgusting statement about how racially and socially divided this country has become. Jennings was the victim -- no doubt about it any longer given facts that finally surfaced in the case -- yet people are still having a hard time believing it... Sad.


More »
Got a question? Something on your mind? Talk to your community, directly.
Note Article
Just a short thought to get the word out quickly about anything in your neighborhood.
Share something with your neighbors.What's on your mind?What's on your mind?Make an announcement, speak your mind, or sell somethingPost something
See more »